Julie V. Iovine, directora del Architect's Newspaper, escribe en el Wall Street Journal que a lo mejor es una bendición que los Juegos Olímpicos de 2016 no hayan sido adjudicados a Chicago. Lo mismo sería aplicable a Madrid.
Asking whether the Olympics is good for a city is like asking if speed dating will lead to a long, solid marriage. The answer to both: It depends. When it comes to the long-term impact of the Olympics on urban well-being, the historical record is surprisingly mixed. Nor do past Olympic hosts provide reliable guidelines for how to guarantee the best outcome. (...)
Beijing's $423 million Bird's Nest stadium has been used only once since last summer's Olympics, for a Jackie Chan concert. The direct subway line to the stadium is largely empty, its state-of-the-art televisions blaring at no one. The five-year plan is to turn the stadium into a shopping and entertainment mall; the same fate awaits the adjacent Blue Cube aquatics center once all the pools are ripped out. (...)
Fear of cost-overruns is the greatest drag on the ability of any city to get enthusiastic about hosting the Games. Numbers are hard to pin down, but one thing is certain: The price of hosting is increasing as steeply as a luge run. Montreal made headlines in 2006 when it paid off the $1.5 billion mortgage on its Olympic stadium, after 30 years. Annual maintenance costs for the sparsely used Beijing stadium are estimated at $10 million. For the 2012 London Games, it is guessed that the city is already $20 billion in the hole with no obvious future revenue stream to pay off the debt if venues are taken down.
